tcord1964 wrote the following post at 10-12-2009 10:03 PM:
I've said it before, and I'll reiterate it again: don't confuse "nationally accredited" with "easy." Some of the toughest college exams I have ever taken were from NA schools.
______________________________
I don't think I made that comparison at all. With any collection of courses in any field, some courses will be beasts and some will be cake-walks. Whether the experience is the same for all has to do, I think, with beckground and skills - you might be a natural at math, and take to an algebra class easily, whereas the same class would be a bear for me. Other aspects of individual courses might also play into the equation, such as the total volume of expected work; thus far, every course I've taken in the Aspen MBA program specifies a minimum assignment length of "200-300 words." Some course modules have contained as few as five individual assignments, while others have had as many as fourteen. Neither was "easy," per say, but the former was much, much easier than the latter. I also found that the bar was set much higher in the Finance course than it was in the Marketing Management course. I was looking for insight from folks who might have been through the program in these regards.
For those who may follow me, looking for similar insight, it's initially looking like I have chosen well, as neither course is a true beast. In their current iterations, eBusiness is much easier than Business Ethics, with shorter assignments, but a perplexingly poorly-written text. I would expect feedback on said book to significantly change the course setup at some time in the future. YMMV.
An finally, I passed the exam. Though it is graded pass/fail, there was a minimum passing grade of 60%, so I was disapointed not to hear back on how well I did. I just got an email from the registrar indicating that I'd passed.