Online Degrees Online Programs Online Courses Online Colleges Campus Programs eLearners Advisor Student Resources Blogs & Forums
Welcome to Online Education and Distance Learning Discussion Forums & Blogs Sign in | Join | Help
College search for 1000+ online degrees, online colleges & online universities

Online Education Blogs

Distance Learning Discussion Forums

Search Blogs & Forums

Inside eLearning by Susan Smith Nash, Ph.D.

Go Inside e-Learning with Susan Smith Nash, Ph.D. Get an insider's look at online education by a former associate dean for liberal arts at a well-known online university.

Her latest book, Excellence in College Teaching and Learning: Classroom and Online Instruction, was co-authored with George Henderson and published in 2007. Leadership and the e-Learning Organization, was published in 2006.

Teach Me? Or Help Me Learn? Which Is Better in eLearning?

By Susan Smith Nash, Ph.D.

Perhaps one of the most shocking things to the new e-learner, or the student returning to school after taking time off, is the fact that instructional strategies have profoundly changed in the last few years.  This is particularly the case in online courses.  While the face-to-face environment may still be place where students file in and sit passively, taking notes as the professor delivers a lecture or drones through a PowerPoint presentation, the typical online course requires a more active approach.  Students are asked to respond to each other and to write papers and create projects rather than simply take standardized quizzes and tests.

 

This was not something that came naturally to eLearning.  You may remember the early days of eLearning, when many providers suggested that the best online course consisted of videotaped lectures streamed over the Internet to students.  It was a colossal failure for many reasons, most of which had to do with the fact that students fell asleep and/or never tuned in again after a few hours of watching a teeny-tiny talking head flicker and freeze on their monitors.  Early proponents of this method used Microsoft's NetMeeting to synch a white board with the taped instructor (classic talking head!).  This was the quintessence of passive learning, and it corresponded to about 0.01% of the general populace's ideal learning style.

 

Other quickly discarded forms of eLearning modeled themselves after the old computer-based learning labs.  These consisted of reading text and then taking multiple-choice or true-false tests.  Although there may be some efficacy to this learning technique, the vast majority of individuals simply do not ever transfer any of this into long-term memory.  Worse, the learners who successfully complete the "skill-and-drill" kinds of activities are not able to do anything with the information they have gotten except skill-and-drill interactive tests.  Perhaps this is acceptable for the learner (or parent or teacher) who simply wants the learner to pass the standardized test in order to graduate or satisfy No Child Left Behind mandates.  However, it is tragically apparent that there is nothing in the long-term memory to use for applying to real-life situations.  Regurgitation of books is not good.  When I think of that type of activity, I can't help think of the Cave of Errour in Spenser's The Faerie Queene, where the ghastly monster, "Errour."  I think that Edmund Spenser's words nicely sum up what goes on when a student is forced to memorize, then regurgitate the facts in order to complete an online test.  

 

Therewith she spewd out of her filthy maw
    A floud of poyson horrible and blacke,
    Full of great lumpes of flesh and gobbets raw,
    Which stunck so vildly, that it forst him slacke
    His grasping hold, and from her turne him backe:
    Her vomit full of bookes and papers was,
    With loathly frogs and toades, which eyes did lacke,
    And creeping sought way in the weedy gras:
Her filthy parbreake all the place defiled has.

From The First Booke of the Faerie Queene by Edmund Spenser.  Retrieved May 3, 2006 from http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rbear/queene1.html

 

True, I may be going a bit overboard.  However, the experience of online courses certainly led instructional designers to push for something besides interactive games.  In addition to not retaining information, students failed. Colleges and universities found that their students felt extreme test anxiety in the timed environment, and that they dropped out of their courses.  Here is the old paradigm:

 

"Teach" the student

 

  • Student is an empty receptacle to be filled up with knowledge
  • Instructional activities involve "filling" up the student, usually reading or engaging in memorization of images or concepts
  • Student should endeavor to find the best way to organize the knowledge, but other than that, the experience is fairly passive
  • Student processes, or "digests" the information
  • Performance on tests demonstrate student's ability to retain the information and to repeat it in more or less the same form it was first presented
  • Discussion, if allowed, is tightly controlled.  Students must respond to very specific prompts.

 

The new paradigm involves active learning.  The instructor is required to be more active and to participate in discussions.  Instead of a simple role of oversight, the instructor must engage on a deeper cognitive level with each student.  It can be more demanding, but instructors by and large prefer it.  It is much more satisfying to interact in a meaningful way with one's students.

 

"Help or Guide" the student

 

  • Student is considered an active participant in the learning process
  • Activities are designed so that the student must review his or her prior knowledge and decide how to build on it or incorporate it
  • Student actively communicates his or her needs, and indicates where more instructional content or activities are needed
  • Student communicates his or her level to the instructor
  • Student is encouraged to make connections between the course content and his or her own interests and/or learning goals
  • Instructor "listens" to the students and helps them make sense of the information.  Special attention is paid to developing schema and organizing principles that can be used.
  • The instructor models how to process information
  • Students encourage each other to use the course content to solve problems and to synthesize the information.
  • Through collaborations and discussion boards, which are open and flexible, students engage in social learning.
  • Instructor encourages students to complete at least one major project that requires problem-solving.

Having a bit of understanding about the two competing paradigms of instruction can help you, as an informed eLearner, align your own preferences with what is available.  Even if not all the activities are completely aligned with your preferred learning styles, most probably will be.  It is just a matter of finding ways to accommodate what is not best for you.  At any rate, it is good to keep in mind that eLearning philosophies are always unfolding and evolving.  Change is good.  So are choices.  Thankfully, you can take advantage of both in eLearning.


[Listen to the companion podcast at:
http://community.elearners.com/blogs/inside_elearning/attachment/342.ashx - 4.24 MB]

 

Add to:                     
Published Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:15 PM by susan
Attachment(s): Teach-Me-or-Help-Me-Learn- Which-Is-Better-in-E-Learning.mp3

Comments

No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled

About susan

Involved in the development and administration of online courses and programs since the early 1990s, Susan Smith Nash has made a point to share her experience as well as her research through her websites, weblogs and podcasts.

The recipient of collaboration and innovation awards for her work in developing innovative and high-quality online and hybrid programs that take advantage of the latest technologies, Nash has been involved with organizations and educational institutions involved in online education and training.

She has published numerous articles in peer-reviewed journals and has made presentations at prominent national conferences. Susan is involved with research into the best ways to use new techniques and technologies (Web 2.0, etc), for effective e-learning (and training).

Her latest book, Excellence in College Teaching and Learning: Classroom and Online Instruction, was co-authored with George Henderson and published in 2007. Leadership and the e-Learning Organization, was published in 2006.

Is an Online Degree Right For Me?

Wait! Before enrolling in an online degree program, you have to take this quick online quiz to find out if you will succeed in distance learning. Don't delay!

susan

Involved in the development and administration of online courses and programs since the early 1990s, Susan Smith Nash has made a point to share her experience as well as her research through her websites, weblogs and podcasts.

The recipient of collaboration and innovation awards for her work in developing innovative and high-quality online and hybrid programs that take advantage of the latest technologies, Nash has been involved with organizations and educational institutions involved in online education and training.

She has published numerous articles in peer-reviewed journals and has made presentations at prominent national conferences. Susan is involved with research into the best ways to use new techniques and technologies (Web 2.0, etc), for effective e-learning (and training).

Her latest book, Excellence in College Teaching and Learning: Classroom and Online Instruction, was co-authored with George Henderson and published in 2007. Leadership and the e-Learning Organization, was published in 2006.

This Blog

Post Calendar

<July 2006>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

Syndication