“The decision by the Maryland Higher Education Commission to prohibit access by Maryland citizens to an online academic program of a Maryland university is insane!” — Donald N. Langenberg, chancellor emeritus of the University System of Maryland
Having grown up and now living back in Northern Virginia, Maryland is the state right across the bridge. It's always a little awkward to watch your neighbor do something silly, but I suppose that's the situation in which we Virginian observers of higher education find ourselves today.
Morgan State University in Baltimore has a campus-based doctoral program in community college administration. The University of Maryland University College is starting a mostly online program in (you guessed it) community college administration. Morgan State sued to stop UMUC from being able to offer this program, even though it's significantly different in mode of study, because Morgan State is a historically black university and as such wants special protection from competition from other universities in the Maryland state system.
There were a number of hearings and so forth, but we'll skip the boring legal stuff and skip to the end, where the ruling yesterday from the Maryland Higher Education Commission was in favor of Morgan State.
But here's what I don't get. There are only two rationales for giving Morgan State special protection, and neither one of them calls for a decision like this.
- If the idea is that Morgan State University should be desegregating, and thus attracting a more diverse student body, then it shouldn't matter whether all those students go to Morgan State or UMUC, because either way they'll be studying together. If the idea is to serve the students, and not to serve the bureaucracy, inhibiting competition makes no sense.
- If the idea is that as a historically black university that Morgan State should be protected from having "its" constituency poached by a different state university, then the university is being protected at the expense of the students it is supposed to be serving. Again, if the idea is to serve the students, and not to serve the bureaucracy, inhibiting competition makes no sense.
It's situations like this that highlight the problem with public HBCUs. If the goal is to provide equal access to public services, then having different outlets for those services meant for different ethnic groups seems really counterintuitive. And I think most people tend to agree, or there wouldn't have been such an outcry about that Louisiana justice of the peace
refusing to marry interracial couples. I suppose the way I see it, the idea that there should there be special public universities that are designed to serve one of my kids, but not the others, just because their moms are different, seems indefensibly strange to me.
It's enough to make one wonder whether Justice wears a blindfold to ensure impartiality — or to hide her tears.
Next up, should one try to learn a foreign language online?
Image courtesy of Mira66